Archive for January, 2010

All That Came Before

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

I understand the fact that all sins are deadly sins and that we will be judged accordingly.  I know that as christians, we must repent.  My question is: what about the sins that were committed before baptism?  I understand that baptism washes away sins, but ANY and ALL sins??  What about murder and/or abortion?  Thanks for this website; I know this will help with questions in the future.

Sincerely,
What About The REALLY Bad Stuff?

Dear What About The REALLY Bad Stuff,

Baptism washes away all sins because baptism buries the old you.  Baptism is a burial with Christ (Rom 6:3-4).  The old sinful you is gone when you come out of the water.  Jesus’ death on the cross paid the price for all our sins (1 Jn 1:7).  There is no sin that is beyond the power of Christ’s blood to remove.

Council Of Laodicea

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

I have heard over and over again, the Bible is perfect as it is.  It is what God wants us to have.  How do you explain what happened in the fourth century with the Council of Laodicea deciding what would and would not be included in the Bible or read at church?  All the books that they decided we didn’t need to read… God gave man free will didn’t He?  And it can be used to make bad choices and siding with evil or good choices.  If this council was able to do that for evil, then we are denied the other books of the Bible by HUMAN choice.  I have read half of the Book of Enoch which is absolutely incredible!  I was in absolute awe with this book.  I realize this book is not complete, but the thought of some council deciding what should be in the canon makes me upset.  How was it even decided?  Do I believe that what we have now is good enough to be saved?  ABSOLUTELY!!  But it also makes me think of the words “Seek and ye shall find!”  I would love to hear your feedback on this.  Thank You.

Sincerely,
Enthralled With Enoch

Dear Enthralled With Enoch,

The Council of Laodicea in 336 A.D. did make decisions about what books would be included in the canon of the Bible… but everyone completely ignored what they said, and their edicts have no impact upon the actual Bible that you read today.  If we followed the Council of Laodicea’s decisions, then we wouldn’t have the book of Revelation (which they excluded from their canon), and we would have the epistle of Jeremy and the book of Baruch (two false books that they included).  That particular council obviously did not dictate what books were or were not kept in the Bible’s canon because we don’t use their canon today.

The Bible’s canon was decided well before the Council of Laodicea; it was decided by the christians who lived during the first century and were in the best situation to know which letters were from divinely inspired apostles and prophets.  It is important to remember that even though God does give us freewill, there are certainly things that He doesn’t allow us to change – His Word is one of those immutable things.  It doesn’t make sense that God would spend thousands of years perfectly crafting the Bible only to allow us to pollute it in a couple hundred years.  Jesus says that not one jot or tittle of the Bible will pass away (Matt 5:18).  The Bible has been perfectly crafted and handed down to us with every stroke and letter right where it ought to be.

The Power Of Choice – Part 2

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

In your post this morning, “The Power of Choice”, you made two points that interest me:

  1. “Anyone can trust God, but very few people are interested in doing so.”
  2. “Whenever you give people freedom, expect most of us to abuse it.”

But given that God created us, why didn’t He create us so that more people are interested in choosing Him?  He could have made us in any way He desired.  But He gives us freedom to choose what we want, plus a natural inclination to turn away from Him.  It doesn’t make much sense.

Sincerely,
Free To Fail

Dear Free To Fail,

Your question has a built-in contradiction.  You wrote, “Why didn’t He create us so that more people are interested in choosing Him?” – if God designs us to choose one thing over another, we aren’t really choosing at all.  It would be like engineering a car that automatically stayed on the road; it would take driver error away, but it would also take driver freedom away.  God didn’t make man with a natural inclination to rebel against Him or choose Him.  God makes every human a blank slate and gives us equal opportunity to decide between righteousness and wickedness.  In the Garden of Eden, God walked with Adam & Eve (Gen 3:8), and the serpent offered deception (Gen 3:1)… both options were available.  Adam & Eve had equal freedom to choose to do the right thing or the wrong thing – perfect freewill.  God sets before us life and death (Deu 30:15), and we have the total freedom to choose either option.  God hasn’t stacked the deck one way or the other.  The entire world is full of sinful temptation, but none of those temptations are beyond our capacity to resist (1 Cor 10:13).  There are false prophets who proclaim false gods (1 Jn 4:1), and yet the entire creation screams of God’s existence, so that we are without excuse (Rom 1:20).  The evidence is there; the choice is ours to freely make.

Cure, Not The Cause

Wednesday, January 27th, 2010

How does God choose who will die a violent death, such as decapitation, stabbing, and rape on even people of christianity?  I don’t understand this.  Does the Bible have an answer for this?

Sincerely,
Why Not Me?

Dear Why Not Me,

The Bible tells us that humans have the freewill to decide our own fates and that we are all affected by the choices we, and others, make.  In the Old Testament, God shows us that bad choices affect people as much as four generations later (Num 14:18).  If a man murders someone, it will have an impact upon him, the family of the deceased, his own children, those on the jury that convict him, etc.  Our choices have consequences, and they cause a ripple effect in the world we live in.  In short, we reap what we sow (Gal 6:7).  God knows our days upon this earth, but He also gives us the freewill to shape various aspects of the world that we live in.  Just because God has knowledge of how you and I will die does not mean that He causes your death to happen in a certain way.  Foreknowledge is not the same as causation.  A doctor may know that a patient is going to die of cancer, but that doesn’t mean the doctor caused the patient to die of that ailment.  God gives mankind the freedom to make decisions; it isn’t His fault when people die violent and horrific deaths.  That is caused by mankind and our decision to rebel and sin.  Remember, the world was made perfect – Adam & Eve destroyed the harmony of the Garden of Eden.  Mankind makes choices that affect the future and the lives of those who live on this planet.

Sins Of The Past

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

Yes, I am a christian and have given my life to Christ.  I try to live a good christian life, but when I was very young, I had an abortion.  I was pushed into it by everyone that I knew, including my parents and my boyfriend.  My question is this… is one sin worse than others?  I have asked the Lord to forgive me, and I was and still am very sincere.  I believe that my sins have been forgiven, but lately I am reading things about abortion that are upsetting to me.   Please help.

Sincerely,
Regretful

Dear Regretful,

All sins are equal, but some sins have worse consequences than others.  In this life a “little white lie” may not cause you much trouble, but committing adultery will devastate your life.  However, in the eyes of God, all sin is deserving of death (Rom 6:23).  That “little white lie” will send you to hell just as much as the adultery would.  Abortion is such a heinous sin because of how deeply it affects the life and emotional state of the mother, the family, and ultimately, because it destroys a child’s life… but abortion can be forgiven through the blood of Christ.  The apostle Paul murdered christians (Acts 26:10), but Christ saved him (1 Tim 1:15).  The person that had an abortion is the old you… in Christ, you are a new person, and the old deeds have passed away (2 Cor 5:17).  Move forward in life with peace of mind knowing you will be reunited with your child in heaven.

Baptism Without Salvation?

Tuesday, January 26th, 2010

I grew up in the church and was baptized as a teenager.  Although I believed in all I had learned growing up, I really only got baptized because it was expected of me.  I knew I should work on my Christianity and start praying and reading my Bible and fixing problems in my life, but I didn’t want to.  I eventually matured and started getting my life in order, but at the time I was baptized, I knew I wasn’t going to do anything about it then.  Does my baptism still count if the repent part of “believe, repent and be baptized” didn’t come until years later?

Sincerely,
On The Right Track Now

Dear On The Right Track Now,

Baptism is based on an appeal to God for a clear conscience (1 Pet 3:21); if we aren’t seeking to turn to God, the baptism is simply you getting wet.  If there is no repentance (‘repentance’ means ‘changing of the mind’) that accompanies baptism, the whole point of the immersion is negated.  Baptism is supposed to be done because we are cut to the heart and desire a new life in Christ (Acts 2:36-38, Rom 6:3-4).

Having said that, it isn’t abnormal for those raised in the church to later question whether they knew enough or were mature enough to be baptized.  Whether you need to be re-baptized is an issue of conscience and self-examination.  You must work out your own salvation with fear and trembling (Php 2:12).  If you truly believe that you were only getting into the water to appease others, you still need to be baptized for remission of your sins.  It us up to you to reflect and ponder whether you have truly obeyed that command.